By TRAVIS FOLEY
Warning: This review contains spoilers for “Avatar: The Last Airbender” and “Avatar: The Last Airbender” (2024).
The 2000s era of animated television is often characterized by the comedic, episodic storytelling of cartoons like “The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy,” “SpongeBob SquarePants” and “Johnny Test.” However, Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko’s “Avatar: The Last Airbender,” a cartoon beloved by fans and critics alike, pioneered a new era of animation with its mature, serialized approach to storytelling. In the modern day, “Avatar: The Last Airbender” has paved the way for complex storytelling in popular cartoons like “Gravity Falls,” “Steven Universe” and “The Owl House.”
With this, it’s unsurprising that numerous studios have attempted to capitalize on the success of “Avatar” with the idea of a live-action adaptation. In 2010, M. Night Shyamalan released his infamous live-action film adaptation, “The Last Airbender,” and now, in 2024, Albert Kim has released his own live-action series adaptation, “Avatar: The Last Airbender” (2024). Like Shyamalan’s film, Kim’s series adapts the first season of the original cartoon, “Book One: Water.”
All versions of the series follow the same general plot: Aang, the Avatar, a boy capable of bending water, earth, fire and air, vanishes just as the Fire Nation wages war on the Water Tribes, Earth Kingdom and Air Nomads. Aang spends 100 years trapped in an iceberg as the war wages on behind him, eventually being freed by two Water Tribe teens, Katara and Sokka. Now, the group must travel around the world as Aang masters the four elements in an effort to end the war. On their travels, they stumble across numerous foes, including Zuko, the banished Prince of the Fire Nation, who seeks to capture the Avatar and regain his honor.
The original “Avatar” is widely praised for its rich worldbuilding and characters, all of which are inspired by Asian and Indigenous cultures. Unfortunately, this was a factor Shamalyan’s “The Last Airbender” failed to adapt, instead opting to whitewash the cast. Thankfully, Kim’s series corrects the mistakes of its live-action predecessor and, for the most part, accurately casts the ethnicities of its characters.
A graphic comparing the characters from each version shows “Avatar: The Last Airbender” on the left, “The Last Airbender” in the middle and “Avatar: The Last Airbender” (2024) on the right. While the 2024 series is accurately cast for the most part, it was suspected in 2022 that Sokka’s actor, Ian Ousley, lied about being Native American to secure his role. (TRAVIS FOLEY/Ethic News Photo)
“Avatar” (2024) sees Gordon Cormier as Aang, Kiawentiio Tarbell as Katara, Ian Ousley as Sokka and Dallas Liu as Zuko.
While this core cast certainly has chemistry, their individual performances prove lacking in some cases, often feeling stiff and bland. Specifically, their line delivery is often accompanied by a dull, deadpan tone that lacks the intense emotion that characterized the dialogue in the original cartoon. Taking Aang and Zuko’s conversation in episode six as an example, Aang looks back on his friendship with a boy named Kuzon and asks Zuko, “If we knew each other back then, do you think we could’ve been friends?” The tone in which Cormier delivers this line is best described as curious and unenthusiastic. However, when comparing this scene to its counterpart from the original cartoon, Aang’s voice actor, Zach Tyler Eisen, delivers similar dialogue but with a tone that encapsulates the hopefulness and nostalgia of the scene unfolding.
Although it’s easy to pin these poor performances on the actors themselves, the issue is more rooted in the script. Oftentimes, scenes are too plagued with awkward dialogue and exposition for the actors to successfully convey strong emotions. Though this isn’t to say there’s never a strong performance throughout the entire show, as there are some of moments where the actors manage to effectively tug on the viewers’ heartstrings.
The lackluster performances and script are only made worse by the 2024 series’ primary issue: its mischaracterization of nearly every main character, especially in regards to Aang and Katara.
Aang is meant to be the epitome of one’s childhood, a boy characterized entirely by his innocence, goofiness and desire to have fun. Yet, in the 2024 series, Aang lacks nearly all these traits, and when they’re present, they’re extremely toned down. His character hinges on his avoidance of responsibility, a trait rooted in his decision to run away from the Air Nomads—the decision that resulted in him getting stuck in the iceberg and consequently missing the Fire Nation’s attack on his people. However, the 2024 series changes this backstory to Aang temporarily leaving the Air Nomads with the full intention of returning in a few short hours, only to have him swept up in the circumstances that trapped him in the iceberg. This change removes all agency from Aang’s decision to leave the Air Nomads and effectively ruins his character arc moving forward; he can’t learn to accept his responsibility as the Avatar if he never ran from it in the first place.
Meanwhile, Katara’s character is rooted in her compassion; she’s defined by her empathy and sense of justice, though she still manages to be short-tempered, stubborn and bossy. Nevertheless, Katara’s 2024 counterpart is virtually unrecognizable, being best described as tame, bland and meek. The series even manages to strip her of her overbearing qualities, reducing her to a “little girl,” despite it going against the established, maladaptive coping mechanism the death of her mother instilled in her. Moreover, at the climax of Katara’s journey to become a waterbending master, she’s finally in the presence of a teacher, Master Paku (A Martinez), though he refuses to teach her because she’s a woman. In response to this, Katara challenges him to a fight, effectively proving her capability and exemplifying her character growth. However, because this climax is originally rooted in her sense of justice, short temper and stubbornness, the lack of these traits in the 2024 series makes the moment feel weak and dull, failing to capture just how pivotal it is to Katara’s character.
Unlike his fellow cast, Zuko’s 2024 counterpart feels rather consistent with what’s seen in the original cartoon, maintaining his bitterness, hot-headed temper and drive for honor. In fact, below this surface, there’s a seed of empathy in Zuko that the 2024 series manages to brilliantly plant. In the original cartoon, Zuko insists on not sacrificing a division of the Fire Nation military, the 41st Division, and is subsequently banished from the country. Meanwhile, the 2024 series follows this same sequence of events but makes the addition of having the 41st Division be the crew that accompanies Zuko during his banishment. Though it doesn’t significantly impact him, the addition contributes emotional depth to Zuko and his banishment alike. This constant presence of the 41st Division serves as a recurring reminder of Zuko’s empathy, reminding the audience that he’s capable of being a good person, while simultaneously reminding Zuko that his empathy has done nothing but get him hurt, exemplifying why it’s now locked away.
The change involving the 41st Division is an outlier among plot changes in “Avatar” (2024), though, as most of them prove detrimental and nonsensical rather than beneficial.
A primary example of this is the change in Aang’s motivation. In the original cartoon, Aang speaks with the spirit of Avatar Roku and learns that he can only end the war if he masters the four elements by the end of summer. This establishes a motivation and sense of urgency that spans the entire cartoon and forces Aang to abandon his childlike urges in favor of ending the war. In the 2024 series, however, Aang speaks with the spirit of Avatar Kyoshi (Yvonne Chapman) and learns that the Northern Water Tribe will soon be invaded by the Fire Nation, and that he is the only one who can prevent them from succeeding. This change establishes a motivation and sense of urgency that span only the season, not the whole series, meaning these factors must now be established on a season-by-season basis rather than having them encompass the whole series. In turn, the 2024 series is set up to be narratively disjointed and disorganized in the wake of its future seasons.
This change also draws a blatant connection between the invasion of the Northern Water Tribe and the genocide of Aang’s people, the Air Nomads. In and of itself, the connection is good, but it attempts (and fails) to highlight Aang’s already doomed character arc and lacks the subtext that made it so good in the original cartoon. Without this subtext, the depth and complexity that the connection added in the original cartoon are lost in translation. Ultimately, it’s evocative of the 2024 series defiance of the number one rule in narrative writing: show, don’t tell. Much like the aforementioned blatant connection, “Avatar” (2024) prefers to exposit plot and character details rather than demonstrate them to the audience.
Another key change is seen in the 2024 series’ approach to waterbending. Despite being an adaptation of the original cartoon’s “Book One: Water,” a season revolving around Aang and Katara learning waterbending, almost no waterbending is learned throughout the 2024 series. By doing this, the 2024 series tampers with a fundamental aspect of the original cartoon’s narrative, as Aang must master all four elements in order to end the war. Much like the change regarding his motivation, this pushes Aang’s task of learning waterbending onto future seasons of the show, taking away even more time that can be better utilized fleshing out other aspects of the characters and plot.
This change also takes away from the original cartoon’s ability to frame its fantastical elements in a realistic, natural way. In the original cartoon, Katara naturally grows as a waterbender before she excels under the guidance of a teacher, establishing bending as a skill that must be honed, not an ability that can naturally strengthen, just like real-life martial arts. Despite this, the 2024 series sees Katara naturally grow as a novice waterbender before spontaneously becoming a “master” by the end of the season. Without proper training to bridge the gap between her novice and master skill levels, Katara’s progression to becoming a waterbending master feels abrupt and irrational; in no world should 2024, untrained Katara match the skill level of cartoon, fully trained Katara. This abrupt approach to becoming a bending master goes against the realism that grounded bending in the original cartoon, making it feel less like a martial art and more like a supernatural ability.
Though, admittedly, there are some more changes in “Avatar” (2024) that aren’t bad. By merging thematically similar plot lines from the original cartoon, the 2024 series is able to seamlessly meld several adventures from the original cartoon into a singular, cohesive episode. In truth, this is a brilliant way to adapt as much material as possible while still remaining faithful to the core of the individual stories. The best example of this is episode three, an episode that melds together four adventures from the original cartoon, “The King of Omashu,” “The Waterbending Scroll,” “Jet” and “The Northern Air Temple.” While the episode itself is certainly flawed, the brilliant execution of its fundamental structure still deserves praise.
At that, some of the 2024 series’ brand new story elements aren’t bad either. Specifically, the addition of having Koh the Face Stealer (George Takei) trap characters within their worst memories is great. The addition not only gives viewers an insightful look into the pasts of Katara, Sokka and Aang but also allows for the characters to process their trauma and grief in a unique, engaging way.
The series finds another lowpoint in its fight choreography. Whereas the original cartoon was renowned for its intricate, engaging fight scenes, the 2024 series fails to replicate this same feel. While the scenes involving fire and airbending feel well choreographed, it’s apparent that water and earthbending are executed in a poorer fashion. This is particularly evident in Katara’s fight against Master Paku, where the waterbending of the scene lacks the fluid, fast-paced nature that defined the ability in the original cartoon.
The reason behind this likely comes down to a fact stated by Zuko’s actor, Dallas Liu, in an interview with nerdist.com. “We’re bending these elements, and obviously, that doesn’t exist in real life. So, we’re allowed to be creative in the way that we wanted it to look. We got to use our imagination to imagine what these bending strikes would look like,” says Liu.
In the original cartoon, the different bending types were influenced by real-life martial arts, attributing Tai Chi to waterbending, Hung Ga to earthbending, Northern Shaolin to firebending and Baguazhang to airbending. This means that giving creative input to actors’ unfamiliar with these styles of martial arts is bound to result in poor fight choreography, much like what’s seen in Katara’s fight with Master Paku. In contrast, the reason fire and airbending appear well choreographed is because the primary examples of said bending types, Zuko and Aang, are portrayed by actors with prior martial arts experience.
Though the 2024 series has many lows, its one true strength comes from its excellent set and costume design. In most cases, the environments and costumes feel like they’re ripped straight from the original cartoon. While there are some distractingly low-quality elements, particularly when it comes to wigs, the show more than makes up for it with the lively, fantastical feel of its setting and wardrobe.
In particular, “Avatar” (2024) excels in its use of color, giving the show a vibrancy that’s lacking in modern fantasy media. Fantasy stories are meant to feel whimsical and inviting, but this can’t be achieved with a dull color palette. Looking to another modern fantasy series as an example, “Percy Jackson and the Olympians” utilizes dull, neutral colors that fail to reflect the wondrous nature of the story, creating an unfit visual representation of the narrative at hand. Thankfully, “Avatar” (2024) serves as a refreshing change of pace, using its vibrancy to accurately represent the story being told. In fact, the series goes as far as dulling colors in specific scenes to reflect moments where all hope and wonder feel lost.
As a whole, Albert Kim’s “Avatar: The Last Airbender” (2024) captures the look and feel of the original “Avatar,” but it lacks its essence. While the 2024 series can be commended for not being a one-to-one adaptation, it’s hard to praise it when it fails to recreate the masterfully crafted world, characters and plot of the original cartoon. The truth is that a show like “Avatar” should never be adapted into live-action because it’s simply too good, so any attempt to recreate it will simply feel like a pale imitation. And unfortunately, the 2024 series’ lackluster execution proves to be just that—a pale imitation of the original cartoon.
With two more seasons confirmed for “Avatar: The Last Airbender” (2024), the best fans can do is hope the creative team behind the series takes their criticisms and attempts to better reflect the original cartoon.
“Avatar: The Last Airbender” (2024) can be streamed now, exclusively on Netflix.
Featured Image: A graphic displaying the posters for all three versions of “Avatar: The Last Airbender” shows the posters for the original cartoon and M. Night Shyamalan’s “The Last Airbender” blurred out and discolored. (TRAVIS FOLEY/Ethic News Photo)
You must be logged in to post a comment.